On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Matt Giuca <matt.giuca@gmail.com> wrote:
While I like free software, I respect the right for people and companies to keep secrets, if they wish. I prefer to let the market decide: if you want to lock up your software, then I won't buy it, but that doesn't mean I should be able to stop you from doing so.
I believe that software which is used by the government, which the government compells citizens to use (EG for communicating with government agencies), or which is needed to interpret data published by the government (IE for reading anything from abs.gov.au) should at the minimum have the source available via escrow. If in 30 years time someone wants to view old government data that is published in MS-Excel format (as happens a lot on abs.gov.au) then we shouldn't be denied access if MS stop selling the software. If MS won't put their source in escrow then MS software should be prohibited for such use. MS can keep their secrets, but a ban on all government purchases should be the result if they choose to do so. The same applies for all data which has government legislation that demands it be kept. This includes financial reports and all manner of medical data. It is simply unacceptable that if a medicine on sale now turns out to give an increased risk of cancer in 20 years time it might be impossible to access all the data related to the production of the medicine and the people it was prescribed to because MS decided to change file formats (*). It is also unacceptable that a company like James Hardy might choose an almost obsolete version of MS-Office to store financial data in order to make it more difficult for lawyers representing people with lung cancer to present a good legal case. (*) I have some knowledge of how things work in a medical company and I believe that this sort of thing will be a real problem. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/